Understanding and Navigating DWI Field Sobriety Tests: A Guide for Drivers

Introduction

Getting pulled over and asked to take a field sobriety test can be an extremely nerve-wracking and confusing experience. While law enforcement utilizes these tests to assess impairment levels and make arrest decisions, no test is completely foolproof.

By better understanding how these tests work, people can make more informed choices during traffic stops. Being aware of one’s rights and potential defenses also proves critical should charges arise later.

What are DWI Field Sobriety Tests?

Field sobriety tests (FSTs) are methods police officers use roadside to evaluate if a driver is too impaired by alcohol or drugs to operate a motor vehicle safely. The battery of tests aims to measure coordination, balance, and mental agility through a set of instructions and observation.

Deviation from proper performance suggests intoxication, informing the officer on arrest decisions. Significant failure flags the need for chemical testing. The entire roadside process remains subjective, however, based on individual officer discretion.

Types of Field Sobriety Tests

There are three main standardized field sobriety tests (SFSTs) commonly used:

Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test:

The officer tracks the movement of the eyes as they follow a stimulus like a pen back and forth assessing involuntary jerking motions that indicate impairment.

Walk-and-Turn (WAT) Test:

The driver takes heel-to-toe steps along a straight line, turns, and returns to the starting point. Steps off line, raised arms and missteps flag intoxication potential.

One-Leg Stand (OLS) Test:

Standing on one leg while counting out loud tests balance capability compromised by high levels of intoxication through hopping or putting the foot down.

Outside these standardized measures, officers might also employ non-official assessments like finger dexterity, reciting sequences, coin rolls or basic movement exercises to further gauge functional capacity and build probable cause for arrest.

Know Your Rights

Before going further into FST intricacies, understand your traffic stop rights:

You have the right to remain silent – you do not have to engage in casual conservation or admit to drinking alcohol or taking medications. Decline politely.

You have the right to an attorney – if arrested, you still do not have to answer questions without legal counsel present. Invoke your right respectfully.

You can refuse field sobriety tests – drivers are not mandated to perform FSTs in most states and such refusal cannot be used against you in court. But officers might still legally detain and otherwise evaluate impairment levels regardless. Efforts to cooperate without performing FSTs directly are suggested instead.

Understanding the Science Behind FSTs

While commonly employed, even the standardized field sobriety tests remain scientifically inconclusive regarding intoxication levels unlike confirmed chemical breath or blood analysis. They rely more on subjective officer interpretations of “clues” indicating impairment. Their accuracy and predictive capability can vary wildly from 30 to 77 percent, letting many false positives slip through. Yet courts still allow FST results as admissible evidence regarding functional capacity during apprehension. So performance means much at the roadside and later in proceedings.

Factors That Can Influence Outcomes

Many inherent conditions beyond alcohol consumption can also influence FST performance, triggering “false positive” results:

Age – natural decline in balance, flexibility, and stamina affects roadside capability for seniors especially.

Physical Condition – inner ear conditions, old injuries, obesity, and neurological disorders easily limit mobility.

Fatigue – exhaustion alters normal coordination much like intoxicants would otherwise reflect sleep debt instead.

Nervousness – stress responses from confrontation situations or attention factors can mimic impairment.

Environmental Conditions – poor lighting, uneven surfaces, weather elements, and wearing heels or restrictive clothing change outcomes.

Why FSTs Are Not Foolproof

Given the lack of irrefutable science behind standardized field sobriety tests, their subjective nature, and external variables influencing results, the protocol remains a rather blunt instrument for conclusive intoxication assessment. With an experienced attorney, drivers can challenge field test results by scrutinizing administration factors and proposing alternative explanations beyond alcohol consumption for performance deficiencies.

Challenging a DWI Field Sobriety Test

No admissible evidence is infallible if subject to reasonable scrutiny under due process. Thus with an attorney’s assistance when challenging a DWI field sobriety test:

Questioning if the officer followed proper procedure – were conditions suitable and instructions clearly given according to guidelines?

Arguing that interpretations of “clues” and test completion are subjective – for instance, video evidence shows otherwise.

Presenting alternative explanations like age, injuries, or nerves influencing outcomes instead of severe intoxication.

Securing additional medical confirmation of explanations through testing records and expert statements.

Alternatives to Field Sobriety Testing

While most agencies use SFSTs regularly, some alternatives include:

Portable Breathalyzers offer preliminary alcohol level readings through immediate voluntary roadside breath samples indicating estimates for further full evidentiary testing later on. Refusals cannot be used against individuals.

Drug Recognition Experts (DREs) are officers receiving advanced sobriety testing training on assessing intoxication beyond alcohol through interviews and medical evaluations estimating categories of substances influencing observed impairment.

FSTs and Implied Consent Laws

Under related implied consent laws, by refusing to submit to required chemical testing after being placed formally under arrest, individuals face automatic driver’s license suspension consequences initiated by the traffic stop officer. However, FST refusal alone does not trigger such license sanctions, keeping rights intact and limiting self-incrimination.

The Role of Field Sobriety Tests in Court

While used to progress from traffic stop to arrest, FSTs often constitute key evidence within criminal DWI proceedings. Assuming proper administration is evident, an officer’s recorded documentation of substantive clues and test failures presents a compelling case regarding functional impairment levels at the time. Such presumed deficiencies work against defendants without strong contradictory data arguments highlighting testing flaws or alternative explanations for poor performance not linked to illegal intoxication directly.

The Importance of an Attorney

When staring down criminal charges like DWI, securing legal representation by an experienced attorney always proves critical for the best chances at positive case resolutions. Beyond deeply understanding the balanced rights involved alongside common law enforcement processes, lawyers leverage this expertise specifically towards defending your freedoms by:

– Investigating Details – inspecting all evidence for chain of custody clarity, testing methodology, and result accuracy regarding specification errors that could nullify legitimacy.

– Mounting Strong Challenges – directly and thoroughly confronting through cross-examination and independently collected proof of any questionable evidence, police testimony inconsistencies, and weak arguments against defendants.

– Presenting Winning Alternatives – providing compelling other scientifically-validated scenarios like medical conditions accounting for apparent impairment observations without unlawful intoxication nexus required for conviction.

– Negotiating Reductions – leveraging case weaknesses to bargain amenable pleas limiting penalties, fines, and license impacts through their extensive prosecution familiarity and relationships.

– Calling Quality Witnesses – retaining ideal medical, toxicology, and subject matter experts to explain agreements with defense positions weakening contradictory prosecution stances.

– Understanding Sentencing Options – utilizing deep legal wisdom to optimize probationary terms, divert programs, and alternative paths maximizing positive longer-term defendant futures.

Conclusion

Roadside field sobriety tests constitute highly subjective evaluations performed under stressful conditions with many external variables that reduce predictive reliability regarding true intoxication levels. Still often key evidence within later DWI cases if properly documented, their results prove defendable utilizing an attorney’s broad expertise challenging flawed testing administration, arguing plausible alternatives, and spotlighting investigative errors towards the most favorable outcomes given your unique circumstances. But beyond mounting technical defenses in court, skilled lawyers provide indispensable guidance at every phase ensuring your rights and voice are protected.

Alcohol, Attorney, Car, driver, Lawyer, Sobriety, Tests, vehicle